Targeted NVH, durability and efficiency optimisation
Most powertrain teams already know which metric is off. Our job is to find the smallest, cheapest change that moves it - and to prove the other metrics didn't quietly degrade in the process.
Who it's for
- Programmes with a known NVH, durability, or efficiency problem
- Teams under late-programme cost-down pressure
- Engineering leaders weighing rework vs design change
When to use it
- Prototype shows whine, durability shortfall, or efficiency miss
- Late-stage cost-down without losing performance
- Validating a supplier change
What we'll model - and why it changes the answer.
Separate gear, bearing, and electromagnetic contributors.
Match accelerated tests to real duty cycles.
Identify whether losses are mesh, churning, bearing, or electromagnetic.
Inputs you can send
- Test data (NVH traces, dyno results, field returns)
- Existing models if you have them
- Programme constraints (cost, packaging, tooling lead time)
What you get back
- Root-cause analysis with evidence
- Ranked change recommendations with effort/impact
- Validation plan against the original metric
Buyer questions, answered straight.
We build one as part of the work. You keep it.
Yes - and we'll tell you what additional data would tighten the recommendation.
Related capabilities
Model the full transmission system - gears, shafts, bearings, housings, and operating duty cycles - and surface the failure modes, efficiency losses, and NVH risks that matter before metal is cut.
Run electromagnetic, thermal, structural, and NVH studies against the same machine model - and couple them to the reducer or transmission - so trade-offs surface as physics, not as opinions.
Discuss a nvh, durability & efficiency optimisation engagement.
A specialist will scope the work and respond directly.